ledfoot wrote:One thing I noticed is that your pitch maximum values are pretty low compared to mine. You should fine the steepest incline you can to get a pitch and roll value and then I usually add about 10 to 15% to that value
bleco wrote:ledfoot wrote:One thing I noticed is that your pitch maximum values are pretty low compared to mine. You should fine the steepest incline you can to get a pitch and roll value and then I usually add about 10 to 15% to that value
I have captured the values on Spa's first incline which is the first one right after the start and it's very steep and could be the reason why my values are so different then yours. I ran a couple of pass up and down in the right and opposite directions... I will try to make additionnal captures tonight and add a 10-15% like you mentionned.
bvillersjr wrote:It would be great to get you involved in the remaining portions as well since you have differing geometry.
In light of recent events, I won't have much time for documentation, but am happy to review and fill in any missing pieces if you do have time to write something up.
bleco wrote:... On Spa track it's the most steep incline ... My profile was built on Spa track only. But it's logic to use all maximum possible values using multiple tracks to be able to use the same profile on multiple tracks and still have good pitch and roll effects ... Limerock and Laguna Seca should give good results.
Noted for myself ...;-)
|Outdated profile message||Forum: X-Simulator Q&A/FAQs||Author: TrueNOS2||Replies: 0|
|frex not working after update iracing||Forum: iRacing||Author: Erwin levasier||Replies: 0|
|iRacing plugin providing shock telemetry data?||Forum: Force-Sender & Plugins||Author: Pax||Replies: 1|
|info setting simconmotion for iracing||Forum: X-Simulator compatible hardware||Author: nizza7||Replies: 0|
|How to send information from an arduino to iRacing||Forum: X-Simulator compatible hardware||Author: wedgeantilles||Replies: 0|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests